Tracker Update: Buttigieg Surge Continues
I was starting to think we might be entering a lull in the campaign season this week. The frenzy of launch season is winding down and there have been few polls and no new endorsements over the last week or two. Certainly over the next year-plus we can expect an ebb and flow in campaign activities that result in meaningful changes to candidate status. But then we got an interesting poll from New Hampshire last night, followed by CNN updating their monthly candidate rankings this morning. Pete Buttigieg was the prime beneficiary in both cases, earning third place with 11% in New Hampshire, and jumping up to fifth in CNN's rankings. As a result, his trend line still resembles the launch phase of an ICBM:
Buttigieg is now even with O'Rourke and possibly heading for Tier 1 territory (depending on whether you're a lumper or splitter I guess). Now to be clear, only the New Hampshire poll is what I would consider fresh new information here. The CNN rankings were last updated in early March, so essentially they're just now catching up to the Buttigieg surge we've been seeing over the last few weeks. Here's the table:
Buttigieg is now even with O'Rourke and possibly heading for Tier 1 territory (depending on whether you're a lumper or splitter I guess). Now to be clear, only the New Hampshire poll is what I would consider fresh new information here. The CNN rankings were last updated in early March, so essentially they're just now catching up to the Buttigieg surge we've been seeing over the last few weeks. Here's the table:
The only area where Buttigieg is lagging at this point is endorsements, but no one has received new endorsements for more than two weeks now.
Other than Mayor Pete, everyone is pretty much staying the course over the past week or so. But here's an interesting trend I want to note: recently there have been state polls in Massachusetts (Warren's home turf), California (Harris' home turf), and New Hampshire (Sander's and Warren's neighborhood). And guess who is leading all three? Biden (23% in MA, 26% in CA, 23% in NH). This suggests a couple of things. First, Biden appears to have broad appeal to Democrats to go along with his high name recognition. But second, I'm wondering if this primary will be more nationalized than past elections. I haven't looked at recent history, so this may have started in 2016 or even before, but traditionally candidates have always performed strongly in their home states and states nearby. Candidates often built their primary strategies around a strong performance in those states to keep them in the game. But if a candidate (Biden or any other) achieves a broad national consensus before the voting even begins, this thing may be over quickly. That's one potential disadvantage of a large candidate slate I guess.
Of course, there's a long way to go before anyone will be declaring victory. Should be a fun ride...


Comments
Post a Comment